Monthly Archives: January 2012

Aaargh! & Ahhh!

Today was a frustrating day.

It was a rough drop-off for my oldest son at school due to a tantrum. From our door to me finally leaving his school was about an hour. We live about one and a half miles away from school.

I uncorked a creative block today at work, but it came at a time that left me precious little time to document it and polish the ideas before tomorrow’s presentations. They will just have to be rough.

My work laptop finally died, with the hard drive thrashing and gnawing like a rat in a trap. I have two important presentations tomorrow, one with a VP, so now I have to use my own gear until the replacement laptop arrives. (Don’t get me started on the options I get to choose from.) I like my personal laptop, but it has the power to generate a stir at work when stirring is not desired.

I bought two of shirts tonight, but it wasn’t until I was walking past the front of the store with a couple of tired kids that I saw the sign advertising three for a reduced price. Thanks, lazy salesclerks!

A project of great endurance almost landed today, but was waved off for another go-around. I’m beginning to wonder if the touch-and-gos will ever be a landing now.

On the bright side, I spent lots of time with my kids today. Four hours with the five year-old and three hours with the two year-old. While they drive me nuts sometimes, they really are a lot of fun, and I was able to get a great picture of the two of them sharing a drink of milk, each with their own straws.

That really made all the other crap I dealt with during the day seem so unimportant, which is was, really.

The Unplanned Parent/teacher Conference

Had one today.

For my kindergartener.

Oi vey.

They grow up, right?

Below Us, Only Clouds

Clouds from above.


“Lisense, regithration, and proof of inthurance, pleaze.”

“Oh, God, a lisp!” He thought as his smirk broke free. “I’m in a fucking movie.” Out loud, “Uh, sorry about blocking the intersection officer, but with all this construction…”

A couple of workers passing by stopped at the exclamation to stare and watch the scene unfold.

“Um, ah, I can explain, officer…”

Tersely, in angry monotone, “Lisense, regithration, and proof of inthurance.”

Karl hastily retrieved his satchel from the back seat and placed it on top of the phone. He fished about for his wallet, and after finding it retrieved his license and insurance card and handed them over before reaching into his glove box for the registration.

“Thurr, this inthurance card is espired.”

The workers guffawed.

“Huh – what?”

“Espired,” he thrust it back through the window.

Taking it back, he saw that it was expired. As of a week ago. He saw the new card sitting on his desk at home in the unopened policy renewal envelope.



Sheepishly, “Sorry, officer, I just realized my new card is at home.”

The mirrored eyes did not blink. Karl returned to the search for his registration. There was some barking in the background, and the lollygagging workers grumbled to each other and moved on. His headache was starting to return with a vengeance.

Instillation of Confidence

It comes neither from volume or rigidity, nor from stridency or conviction, but from the bedrock, innate certitude that anything is indeed possible if one is willing to suspend one’s belief in falling short.

A Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution

The recent SOPA/PIPA grass-roots Internet kerfuffle got me thinking about participatory democracy and the ability for United States citizens to influence legislation in the United States, and I present this for consideration:


Section 1. The twelfth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.

Section 2. The offices of President and Vice-President shall be directly elected by the citizens of the United States of America by ballot. The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President. The person having the greatest number of votes for Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President.

Section 3. In the event the greatest numbers of votes cast as described in Section 2 for either or both the office of President or the office of Vice-President are an equal number, the United States Congress shall convene no later than three days after the Presidential and Vice-Presidential election, and each member shall choose by ballot either the President or Vice-President as needed. The balloting and tabulation thereof shall be overseen jointly by the Speaker of the House, the President of the Senate, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. All ballots shall be a matter of public record and recorded in the Federal Register. The person having the greatest number of votes as President, shall be the President and the person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President.

Section 4. In the event the ballots cast as described in Section 3 are an equal number for either the office of President or the office of Vice-President, the Speaker of the House, the President of the Senate, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall meet to select the President or Vice-President as needed.

I have taken the liberty of re-using similar text from other amendments in authoring this amendment and building the fallback protocol in the event of a tie or ties. (Here my Internet engineering roots show.)

Constitutional amendments over the years have been varied, but each has been adopted in the spirit of the preamble of the Constitution:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

I offer the above in the same spirit during an era in which a Presidential and Vice-Presidential election has been contested and the public’s confidence in the electoral system continues to ebb. My hope is that this addresses one small area of lingering concern in the system we use to elect the highest executive offices of the land.

The thrusts of this amendment are multiple:

  1. Increase the real and perceived impact of each citizen’s vote, thus strengthening our shared investment in the republic.
  2. Increase the viability of third-party candidates and hopefully thereby increase the pressure on political parties to address the electorate as a whole instead of their vocal sub-minorities, which creates a political environment that tends to divide instead of unite us.
  3.  Increase the possibility of different political parties winning the offices of President and Vice-President, for similar reasons as outlined in point 2.
  4. Abolish the Electoral College and the negative effects it has on campaigning in the form of outsized attention to so-called “swing states”.
  5. Abolish the Electoral College and the negative effects it has on the election in what I call “vote dampening”, which is when exit polling projections suppress voter turnout due to a real or perceived loss by voter’s supported candidates, and thus negatively impact local or state elections, initiatives or referendums that have plurality or threshold turnout requirements, which are usually education and safety bond measures. This effect tends to be more pronounced in the Western states.

The roots of our democracy can be directly traced back to the Magna Carta of 1297 that codified the concept that the legislation of the people was of a higher authority than the proclamations of the King or Queen, which historically were viewed as agents of divine intercession on Earth. Big stuff.

This philosophical thread was prominent in the Declaration of Independence of 1776, the Constitution of the United States of 1787, and the Bill of Rights of 1789. These three documents form the backbone of the governance and administration of the sovereign entity of the United States of America, and through the foresight of James Madison, a mechanism and right to amend the Constitution was codified in the Bill of Rights.

As a citizen of the United States of America, I am exercising this right, and I urge you to join me.

So what’s next?

The procedure is clear. In a nutshell, Congress needs to approve the proposal by a two-thirds majority and three-fourths of state legislatures need to approve it as well.

We need Congress to propose this amendment as a joint resolution. This will require sponsors in the House and the Senate. Once we have have sponsors, we will then lobby for a vote to approve the resolution by both houses with two-thirds majorities.

At the same time, we need state-by-state action to approve the amendment.

What can you do? You can start by sharing this post far and wide. A suggested Twitter hashtag is #28amendment.

Then, we’ll need help bootstrapping this process by setting up the framework to run this campaign. On the technical end this includes database, automated mailer, hosting, and bandwidth help, and on the human factors side it’s copywriting, editing, graphic design,  communications, project management and the other various and sundry things needed to organize and communicate.

The SOPA/PIPA framework seemed to work pretty darn well, so if we can replicate that, all the better.

After that, it will be to contact your federal and state Representatives and Senators, and ask them to sponsor and vote for the above amendment using the communications framework yet to be built.

Ideally, we’ll be able to get the ball rolling prior to the federal election this November and all be able to enjoy watching the politicians explain their stand on this proposed amendment.

Epic Snow at Snoqualmie Pass, WA


A Nissan Pathfinder.